Last year’s news that our government had dropped its 2012 plans to slap a minimum price on alcohol were welcomed by those who felt it was always going to be downright daft to penalise millions of moderate drinkers to pay for the excesses of a few immoderate ones. Much fairer, surely, to make drunk and disorderly a much more serious crime, with seriously larger penalties, this reflecting the damage to the community done by the binge-drinkers and the burden on the police and health services?
Now, it is alleged, the government’s sensible U-turn was due to pressure put on them by the powerful alcohol lobby, at hundreds of often secret meetings. It is also alleged that reports revealing some benefits of minimum alcohol pricing were buried until after the U-turn decision was made. Continue reading